News & Insights
< Back to Blogs
Quiet Quitting: How to Spot it and What to Do About It
October 28, 2022
You may have recently heard the phrase ‘quiet quitting’ across your social media and professional networks. The term has sparked enormous debate online, with some leaders viewing it negatively and others relating to what it means.
But the name itself is misleading - it is not about quitting at all. It is simply a way for employees to indicate their desire to achieve a healthy work-life balance. If companies can assist with this, it’s a win all round, as a happy employee is much more likely to contribute to company success than an unhappy one.
What follows is a brief look at what quiet quitting means and ways you can spot it amongst your team, alongside some strategies for addressing it and improving employee engagement.
What is Quiet Quitting?
First coined in 2009 by economist Mark Boldger, the phrase ‘quiet quitting’ has experienced a recent resurgence due to a short viral TikTok video by @zaidleppelin. He explains it as “… not outright quitting your job but …quitting the idea of going above and beyond.”
There is some difficulty in spotting quiet quitting signs, especially in the tech industry where remote and hybrid working means you have limited in-person contact with your employees. However, there are signs they might indicate low engagement in staff who have decided to ‘quiet quit’.
Some examples include:
- A sustained lack of motivation
- A reluctance (or cessation) of asking questions
- Declining taking on new tasks, responsibilities or projects
- Acting noticeably withdrawn
- Taking more sick leave
- Voicing a persistent frustration with tasks, colleagues or other stakeholders
The key is frequency. While many of these things might occur as once-offs due to a variety of reasons, if they persist over prolonged period, you may have a quiet quitter on your team.
Another key indicator is if you have a marked increase in employee resignations, a situation made increasingly difficult with the current market shortage of top IT talent.
The Reasons Behind Quiet Quitting
To address quiet quitting it is important to source the core reason/s for employee disengagement. When it comes to tech jobs, many employees work far beyond standard hours to meet team project deadlines, often on tasks well outside their job description.
At the same time, they are very aware of their market value (not to mention the rising costs of living) and if their remuneration package isn’t keeping pace - thus rewarding them fairly - this could be a reason to mentally ‘check out.’ It’s a common occurrence - according to the HackerRank 2020 Developer Skills report 39% of Developers believe they’re being paid unfairly compared to peers.
Other key reasons for quiet quitting in the tech industry include:
- Feeling overwhelmed
- Discomfort in establishing boundaries
- A reluctance to speak to managers about their feelings
- A misalignment between company and personal values
- A lack of understanding in how their work contributes to the greater company purpose
The following strategies will not only help you uncover the ‘why’ behind any potential quiet quitters but assist you in improving employee engagement and happiness within your team. It will have natural positive flow on effects on productivity, company culture and company brand, which are all vital for employee retention and new talent attraction.
Ways to Address Quiet Quitting
Here are some options you can consider in order to manage quiet quitting in your workplace.
- Uncover Your Employees' "Why"
If you notice a team member who might be disengaging the first step to take is to arrange a one-on-one to discuss how they're feeling. Hopefully, they will feel comfortable enough to explain what’s going on.
Once you have this information, you can start to work together on a plan to address the issues. For instance, you may find your team member is keen to progress from being a Developer to a Technical Lead but they feel so burned out that they've declined taking on tasks that would help get them there. Should this be the case, consider whether a team reshuffle or bringing in new resources may help.
- Foster An Open Feedback Culture
It's difficult to address an issue when you don't know about it. That is why honest employee feedback is so important. Some may feel reluctant to share this directly, so an anonymous mechanism is a good idea, utilising software such as CultureAmp or OfficeVibe.
In conjunction with this, consider consulting with upper management (including your CEO) to discuss the possibility of a regular open forum feedback session focused on employee experience.
For both instance the action after the feedback is the most vital (and employee-valued) part of the process.
- Embed Breaks into Your Working Culture
A fully productive employee requires regular rest and replenishment, and breaks are an ideal way to achieve this.
While you might encourage your employees to take both breaks and all offered annual leave, consider whether current team conditions are conducive. Do employees feel like they can't take time off as they don't have adequate cover? Do they worry about letting the team down?
If you suspect this is the case, think about what supports you can put in place to achieve this, whether it's reaching out to a trusted technology and digital recruitment agency for temporary staff or extra permanent resources.
Another way to encourage employees to take their breaks is to shift the focus from hours work to impact made. If employees understand they're not required to push through and work excessive hours just to get ahead but merely work as productively as they can, this can go a long way towards avoiding cases of burnout and quiet quitting.
- Review Employee Workloads and Your Workplace Practices
You may receive feedback about employee workloads and inefficient workplace practices. With workloads, critically evaluate what is currently in your team's pipeline and consider where you can make improvements.
Brainstorm what you could do to enhance your team's work processes, particularly around guidelines about how meetings should run, and what should constitute a meeting (i.e. would an email suffice?).
- Set Work-Life Boundaries
Setting boundaries around work contact hours releases employees from the pressure to respond. Options can include a strict finish time for all staff, a company-wide lunch hour where no one holds meetings or responds to emails, and a 'no-contact' policy for those on leave.
Employees may still choose to work outside these hours but that is their choice. It is not an obligation, perceived or otherwise.
Remote working gives employees the benefit of attending to personal matters during the workday, but some staff may feel like it is not an option they can take, even though it could help them with their work-life balance (i.e. doing the school run, attending medical appointments, volunteering at school etc.).
If you don't already, explicitly offer your staff this flexibility with the trust they will make up for the missed work hours. It could be a real game-changer for them.
- Help Staff to See Their Purpose
Quiet quitting might be a sign that your team members no longer know what they're really working for. Most employees need to feel a sense of purpose in their role, knowing their contribution is making a difference.
Think about ways you can help your team members see the value of their work and most importantly, the impact it makes. You may need to engage other stakeholders in this quest, including those in upper management.
Further Support
Much of the advice suggested here about avoiding quiet quitting centres on giving your team members autonomy - the ability to choose how and their work is done depending on their professional and personal circumstances. In doing this, you will help them right their work-life balance scales and re-engage with their job.
If you need further assistance in this area, or are looking to add some extra resources to your team, please connect with one of our Sydney Technology and Digital recruitment specialists. We'd be happy to assist.
Share This Article
Recent Articles
Automated CV screening. Chatbot interviews. Interview scheduling bots. It’s no secret that tech is reshaping how we hire. In many ways, for the better. Speed, efficiency and cost control are all compelling reasons to automate. But while automation can solve for process, it can’t replace connection. Where Automation Adds Value Smart tech in the right places can remove friction and bias: CV screening tools that score against role criteria Automated interview scheduling that respects everyone’s time Chatbots that answer FAQs for candidates instantly Assessment platforms that test skills fairly. Used well, these tools enhance the hiring journey. Used poorly, they can feel like a wall, not a gateway. Where Experience Still Wins Candidates remember how you made them feel. No tech stack can: Explain what makes your culture different Read between the lines of a nervous candidate’s response Give personalised feedback or reassurance Advocate for someone who might be a wildcard but fits beautifully. How to Balance Both Automate admin, not empathy. Use tools to speed up logistics like interview booking or FAQs, but keep human contact for key interactions. Tell candidates what’s happening. Ghosting is often the result of automation without communication. Be transparent. Track candidate sentiment. Use surveys or NPS to measure how your process feels to candidates, not just how it performs. Train your people. A great recruiter using tech well is better than tech replacing recruiters. Make sure your teams know how to use the tools and build rapport. Personalise where it matters. A quick check-in call or tailored email can mean the difference between a disengaged candidate and a future advocate. 
In enterprise IT, productivity isn’t just about technology or tools. It’s about people and how they work together. Yet, many organisations unknowingly suffer from a silent killer: misaligned roles and poor team dynamics that quietly zap efficiency, stall projects and drive up costs. What’s Causing This Productivity Drain? Rapid growth, shifting business priorities, and evolving technology landscapes can leave IT teams fragmented. Without strategic hiring and ongoing team calibration, roles overlap or leave critical gaps. Communication falters when technical experts and business stakeholders don’t share a clear vision or language. Over time, this erodes morale, increases turnover risk, and ultimately delays delivery. This can mean: Employees working in roles that don’t fully leverage their expertise Communication breakdowns between technical and business units Overlapping responsibilities or gaps in critical skills Reduced morale leading to higher turnover risk. The Cost of Ignoring Team Fit It’s easy to overlook how these issues impact bottom-line results: Delayed product launches and missed deadlines slow time-to-market and revenue growth. Hidden inefficiencies multiply as duplicated work or unresolved handoffs pile up. Increased employee churn creates continuous disruption and recruitment costs. Reduced innovation capacity limits your organisation’s ability to adapt to emerging challenges. However, there is a solution: targeted recruitment. Effective IT recruitment goes beyond filling seats. It focuses on: Understanding organisational goals and culture Assessing candidates’ technical skills alongside interpersonal and leadership abilities Building complementary teams with diverse, balanced skill sets Enabling collaboration between IT and business stakeholders. How Strategic Recruitment Solves the Problem The solution goes beyond sourcing technical skills. It requires a holistic approach that: Aligns hiring to your business roadmap and strategic objectives. Prioritises candidates’ ability to collaborate, communicate and lead within your unique culture. Builds balanced teams that complement strengths and fill gaps, enhancing overall capability. Facilitates ongoing evaluation to recalibrate team structures as needs evolve. Building Teams That Deliver Outcomes When recruitment focuses on fit and alignment, IT teams become more than just a collection of skills — they become engines of business value. High-performing teams accelerate project delivery, foster innovation, and improve resilience against disruption. Partnering for Success Enterprise IT Recruitment works closely with organisations to develop targeted talent strategies that address these challenges head-on. Is your IT team structured to deliver peak productivity? If not, it’s time to rethink your recruitment strategy before the silent killer stalls your growth. We're here to help - get in touch here .
Speed and quality are often viewed as competing priorities when hiring in the tech market. Hiring managers and talent teams face ongoing pressure to fill roles quickly, especially in candidate-short markets. However, bringing in the wrong hire can cost dearly in productivity, morale and retention. So, how can businesses scale teams rapidly without sacrificing quality? Is it possible to have both speed and quality in tech hiring? We think so—and here’s how. Why the trade-off exists The tension between speed and quality usually stems from a lack of clarity or preparation. Rushed processes often skip essential steps like cultural alignment, technical testing or stakeholder buy-in. On the flip side, overly meticulous processes risk losing top talent to faster-moving competitors. The sweet spot lies in structure, communication, and smart tooling. The cost of getting it wrong Hiring too fast, without due diligence, can lead to: Poor team fit and early attrition Productivity loss due to underperformance Reputational damage, especially in tight-knit tech communities. Meanwhile, moving too slow can result in: Lost candidates to faster companies Prolonged project delays Burnout among existing team members carrying the extra load. Strategies for speed and quality Define success up front Get clear on the must-haves vs. nice-to-haves for each role. Involve both technical leads and cultural stakeholders early. A well-aligned brief means faster shortlisting and better screening. Use pre-qualified talent pools Work with a recruitment partner that specialises in tech and already has deep, pre-screened networks. This cuts sourcing time and improves candidate experience from the start. Implement structured interviewing Use consistent questions and scoring frameworks across candidates. It removes bias, saves time and enables faster comparisons. Tech-enable your process Leverage tools like automated scheduling, coding platforms and AI-powered CV screening to reduce manual work without compromising assessment depth. Communicate with intent Regular feedback loops between hiring managers, HR and external partners speed up decision-making. Candidates also stay engaged when communication is proactive and transparent. Set SLA benchmarks Create internal SLAs for each stage of the hiring process. For example, resume review within 48 hours, interviews booked within 3 days, and feedback within 24 hours. These benchmarks help maintain velocity without losing quality. Pilot and iterate If your current hiring approach isn’t working, test new workflows. For example, trial a pre-interview technical screen instead of a live coding test. Track success rates and time-to-hire data to inform improvements. The Bottom Line Speed and quality don’t have to be mutually exclusive. With the right structure, clear expectations, and smart use of tools and talent partners, you can build a hiring engine that delivers both.
Filter By Category
Subscribe to our News & Advice
Automated CV screening. Chatbot interviews. Interview scheduling bots. It’s no secret that tech is reshaping how we hire. In many ways, for the better. Speed, efficiency and cost control are all compelling reasons to automate. But while automation can solve for process, it can’t replace connection. Where Automation Adds Value Smart tech in the right places can remove friction and bias: CV screening tools that score against role criteria Automated interview scheduling that respects everyone’s time Chatbots that answer FAQs for candidates instantly Assessment platforms that test skills fairly. Used well, these tools enhance the hiring journey. Used poorly, they can feel like a wall, not a gateway. Where Experience Still Wins Candidates remember how you made them feel. No tech stack can: Explain what makes your culture different Read between the lines of a nervous candidate’s response Give personalised feedback or reassurance Advocate for someone who might be a wildcard but fits beautifully. How to Balance Both Automate admin, not empathy. Use tools to speed up logistics like interview booking or FAQs, but keep human contact for key interactions. Tell candidates what’s happening. Ghosting is often the result of automation without communication. Be transparent. Track candidate sentiment. Use surveys or NPS to measure how your process feels to candidates, not just how it performs. Train your people. A great recruiter using tech well is better than tech replacing recruiters. Make sure your teams know how to use the tools and build rapport. Personalise where it matters. A quick check-in call or tailored email can mean the difference between a disengaged candidate and a future advocate. 
In enterprise IT, productivity isn’t just about technology or tools. It’s about people and how they work together. Yet, many organisations unknowingly suffer from a silent killer: misaligned roles and poor team dynamics that quietly zap efficiency, stall projects and drive up costs. What’s Causing This Productivity Drain? Rapid growth, shifting business priorities, and evolving technology landscapes can leave IT teams fragmented. Without strategic hiring and ongoing team calibration, roles overlap or leave critical gaps. Communication falters when technical experts and business stakeholders don’t share a clear vision or language. Over time, this erodes morale, increases turnover risk, and ultimately delays delivery. This can mean: Employees working in roles that don’t fully leverage their expertise Communication breakdowns between technical and business units Overlapping responsibilities or gaps in critical skills Reduced morale leading to higher turnover risk. The Cost of Ignoring Team Fit It’s easy to overlook how these issues impact bottom-line results: Delayed product launches and missed deadlines slow time-to-market and revenue growth. Hidden inefficiencies multiply as duplicated work or unresolved handoffs pile up. Increased employee churn creates continuous disruption and recruitment costs. Reduced innovation capacity limits your organisation’s ability to adapt to emerging challenges. However, there is a solution: targeted recruitment. Effective IT recruitment goes beyond filling seats. It focuses on: Understanding organisational goals and culture Assessing candidates’ technical skills alongside interpersonal and leadership abilities Building complementary teams with diverse, balanced skill sets Enabling collaboration between IT and business stakeholders. How Strategic Recruitment Solves the Problem The solution goes beyond sourcing technical skills. It requires a holistic approach that: Aligns hiring to your business roadmap and strategic objectives. Prioritises candidates’ ability to collaborate, communicate and lead within your unique culture. Builds balanced teams that complement strengths and fill gaps, enhancing overall capability. Facilitates ongoing evaluation to recalibrate team structures as needs evolve. Building Teams That Deliver Outcomes When recruitment focuses on fit and alignment, IT teams become more than just a collection of skills — they become engines of business value. High-performing teams accelerate project delivery, foster innovation, and improve resilience against disruption. Partnering for Success Enterprise IT Recruitment works closely with organisations to develop targeted talent strategies that address these challenges head-on. Is your IT team structured to deliver peak productivity? If not, it’s time to rethink your recruitment strategy before the silent killer stalls your growth. We're here to help - get in touch here .
Speed and quality are often viewed as competing priorities when hiring in the tech market. Hiring managers and talent teams face ongoing pressure to fill roles quickly, especially in candidate-short markets. However, bringing in the wrong hire can cost dearly in productivity, morale and retention. So, how can businesses scale teams rapidly without sacrificing quality? Is it possible to have both speed and quality in tech hiring? We think so—and here’s how. Why the trade-off exists The tension between speed and quality usually stems from a lack of clarity or preparation. Rushed processes often skip essential steps like cultural alignment, technical testing or stakeholder buy-in. On the flip side, overly meticulous processes risk losing top talent to faster-moving competitors. The sweet spot lies in structure, communication, and smart tooling. The cost of getting it wrong Hiring too fast, without due diligence, can lead to: Poor team fit and early attrition Productivity loss due to underperformance Reputational damage, especially in tight-knit tech communities. Meanwhile, moving too slow can result in: Lost candidates to faster companies Prolonged project delays Burnout among existing team members carrying the extra load. Strategies for speed and quality Define success up front Get clear on the must-haves vs. nice-to-haves for each role. Involve both technical leads and cultural stakeholders early. A well-aligned brief means faster shortlisting and better screening. Use pre-qualified talent pools Work with a recruitment partner that specialises in tech and already has deep, pre-screened networks. This cuts sourcing time and improves candidate experience from the start. Implement structured interviewing Use consistent questions and scoring frameworks across candidates. It removes bias, saves time and enables faster comparisons. Tech-enable your process Leverage tools like automated scheduling, coding platforms and AI-powered CV screening to reduce manual work without compromising assessment depth. Communicate with intent Regular feedback loops between hiring managers, HR and external partners speed up decision-making. Candidates also stay engaged when communication is proactive and transparent. Set SLA benchmarks Create internal SLAs for each stage of the hiring process. For example, resume review within 48 hours, interviews booked within 3 days, and feedback within 24 hours. These benchmarks help maintain velocity without losing quality. Pilot and iterate If your current hiring approach isn’t working, test new workflows. For example, trial a pre-interview technical screen instead of a live coding test. Track success rates and time-to-hire data to inform improvements. The Bottom Line Speed and quality don’t have to be mutually exclusive. With the right structure, clear expectations, and smart use of tools and talent partners, you can build a hiring engine that delivers both.
On March 27, 2025, the Federal Parliament passed new legislation that will reshape how large employers in Australia approach workplace gender equality. Under the reforms, businesses with 500 or more employees will now be required to: Set three gender equality targets, with at least one being numeric; Demonstrate progress toward these targets within three years; Continue reporting annually to the Workplace Gender Equality Agency (WGEA). This is a milestone moment in a play to shift the Australian workplace culture. It reflects a growing push for accountability, transparency and meaningful change in the workplace. So, what does this mean for employers? Targets Must Be Tangible A vague commitment to “improving gender diversity” won’t cut it. Employers will need to back up their intentions with measurable goals - such as increasing women in leadership, closing pay gaps, or improving retention in underrepresented groups. Data-Driven Decisions Will Lead the Way To set realistic, evidence-based targets, companies will need to dive deep into their workforce data. Understanding where the gaps are - whether it’s in hiring, promotion pathways, or pay equity - is step one. Policies, Processes & People It’s also a nudge to reassess internal practices. Are your recruitment and promotion processes inclusive? Are flexible work arrangements available (and used) equitably? Is your leadership team actively invested in supporting diversity outcomes? Accountability Goes Public WGEA will continue to publish pay gap data—and now, target progress too. That means internal efforts will be visible externally, and employers leading the way will build stronger reputations as equitable, forward-thinking workplaces. Why it matters to us at EITR At EITR , we work with businesses undergoing transformation - and the best transformations start from within. Hiring diverse, high-performing teams isn’t just a compliance box to tick—it’s how companies thrive. This legislation reflects a shared responsibility to build workplaces where talent can grow and succeed, regardless of gender. Whether you're a business navigating these new expectations or a candidate seeking an inclusive environment where your career can flourish - we’re here to support you.  🔗 Want to know more about how we help organisations build diverse, future-ready teams? Get in touch with us here .
For years, companies have been locked in a battle to attract the best candidates - offering higher salaries, bigger perks, and more benefits in the hopes of outbidding their competitors. But in 2025, the conversation is shifting. The companies winning today aren’t necessarily the ones offering the biggest paychecks; they’re the ones adapting to how work is changing. The talent war isn’t about hiring faster or throwing more money at the problem anymore - it’s about rethinking how we build workforces altogether. So, how are leading organisations shifting their approach? They’re moving beyond outdated recruitment battles and focusing on internal mobility, skills development, flexible work models, and alternative hiring pipelines. Why the Talent War No Longer Works The idea of a "talent war" assumes that there’s a fixed number of high-performing professionals, and companies must compete to secure them. But this approach has a few major flaws: It’s expensive - Constantly outbidding competitors for the same people isn’t sustainable. It’s short-sighted - Hiring externally without investing in existing employees leads to retention issues. It ignores hidden talent - Many businesses overlook high-potential candidates who may not fit a traditional mold but have the skills and adaptability to thrive. With unemployment rates remaining low and skills shortages persisting in industries like technology, cybersecurity, and engineering, businesses must stop seeing hiring as a competition and start treating it as a strategic transformation. The Talent Shift... What’s Changing? Instead of treating hiring as a race for the same candidates, leading companies are making three key shifts: 1. Internal Mobility: Investing in the People You Already Have Companies are realising that the best candidate for the job might already be within their organisation. Instead of constantly hiring externally, businesses are focusing on upskilling, cross-training, and internal promotions. 📌 Example: Atlassian has developed structured career pathways that help employees transition into new roles without leaving the company, reducing external hiring needs. 2. Skills Over Job Titles More companies are moving toward skills-based hiring, recognising that traditional job titles and degree requirements can exclude high-potential candidates. Rather than asking, “Who has a degree in computer science and five years of experience?” companies are now asking, “Who has the problem-solving and coding skills to excel in this role?” 📌 Example: Telstra has introduced skills-based hiring initiatives, allowing candidates from non-traditional backgrounds to break into tech roles based on their capabilities, not just their CVs. 3. Alternative Hiring Pipelines Companies are expanding their candidate pools by looking beyond the usual recruitment channels. This includes: Partnering with universities and bootcamps Offering return-to-work programs for career changers Creating more entry-level pathways and apprenticeships 📌 Example: The Victorian Government’s Digital Jobs Program is helping mid-career professionals transition into the tech industry through funded training and job placements. The Future of Work is Built - Not Bought Companies that succeed in 2025 and beyond will be the ones that build their talent, not just buy it. By moving away from outdated hiring models and focusing on development, flexibility, and inclusivity, organisations can create workforces that aren’t just competitive - but sustainable. The talent war may be over, but the companies that adapt to this new reality will be the ones leading the next decade of innovation.
In 2025, the ability to balance technical proficiency with human-centric qualities like adaptability, creativity, and emotional intelligence will define the leaders in tech hiring.
The most sought-after tech professionals aren’t just looking for work - they’re looking for alignment. They want to see companies with a clear purpose, genuine values, and a willingness to invest in people as much as products.
So, what will the workforce of 2025 look like, and how can businesses prepare for the changes ahead? Let’s explore the key trends and actionable strategies.
Whether you run a small business or a large enterprise, strong cybersecurity practices are essential to protecting your organisation from potentially devastating breaches. However, you don’t always need expensive technology or an army of security experts to keep your business safe. Sometimes, good cyber hygiene - simple, everyday practices - can make all the difference in maintaining security.
For businesses to stay competitive, and for employees to remain relevant, continuous learning through upskilling and reskilling is a non-negotiable.
